On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> bridge's Subordinate Bus Number in config space == bus->subordinate == >>>> bus->busn_res.end (correct me if I'm wrong). I don't like the >>>> redundancy in this case. >>> >>> there are about 70 bus->subordinate reference and 40 bus->secondary reference. >>> >>> could try to update them in following patch set. >> >> If you're proposing this: >> 1. add bus->busn_res >> 2. remove bus->subordinate and bus->secondary >> I fully support that, and I'd like to merge both pieces at the same >> time (different patches is fine; I just want to make sure both pieces >> actually happen). > > yes. Can you consider applying "removing bus->subordinate" patch set > to be applied after: > for-pci-busn-alloc > for-pci-root-bus-hotplug > for-pci-for-each-res-addon > for-pci-res-alloc > > otherwise there would be some extra rebase work for last three patch set. spent several hours today to have attached patch that will remove pci_bus secondary/subordinate. and tested with my setups with remove/scan test case. looks ok. need to apply it after for-pci-busn-alloc for-pci-root-bus-hotplug. Please check if i miss anything. Thanks Yinghai
Attachment:
kill_bus_subordinate_x.patch
Description: Binary data
