On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:54:06PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:37:27PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > I'm all for digging further into this issue with the help of Qualcomm, > > > but I don't think that should block this series as that would leave the > > > link errors that we hit since 6.7 in place and effectively prevent us > > > from enabling the ITS in 6.9. > > > > Sounds fair. I will report back, perhaps with a fix based on what I get to know. > > Sounds good, thanks. > > > But I think it is better to disable L0s in the SoC dtsi itself. That's not only > > because there are patches to essentially disable L0s in 2 of the available > > platforms making use of this Soc, but also you are enabling GIC ITS in the SoC > > dtsi and that may affect sa8540p which is making use of this dtsi. > > I did not do so on purpose as I'm only disabling L0s on machines where > I've confirmed the issue. And the assumption for now is that this is a > machine-level issue. > > > The users of that SoC may have not noticed the errors as you did before, but > > enabling GIC ITS will certainly make the issue visible to them (more likely). > > Sure and that would be good to know as that would give us another data > point which may help determine where the problem lies. Enabling the ITS > will (hopefully) be done in 6.9 so we'll have a whole cycle to disable > L0s where needed. I don't think this should be done before then. > Ok. Let's see what happens :) For the series: Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
