Hi,
On 2024-02-21 10:10, Minda Chen wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:02 PM Minda Chen <minda.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As PLDA dts binding doc(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/
> > > > plda,xpressrich3-axi-common.yaml) showed, PLDA PCIe contains an
> > > > interrupt controller.
> > > >
> > > > Microchip PolarFire PCIE event IRQs includes PLDA interrupts and
> > > > Polarfire their own interrupts. The interrupt irqchip ops includes
> > > > ack/mask/unmask interrupt ops, which will write correct registers.
> > > > Microchip Polarfire PCIe additional interrupts require to write
> > > > Polarfire SoC self-defined registers. So Microchip PCIe event irqchip ops can
> > not be re-used.
> > > >
> > > > To support PLDA its own event IRQ process, implements PLDA irqchip
> > > > ops and add event irqchip field to struct pcie_plda_rp.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h | 3 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > > index b3df373a2141..beaf5c27da84 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > > @@ -770,6 +770,64 @@ static struct irq_chip mc_event_irq_chip = {
> > > > .irq_unmask = mc_unmask_event_irq, };
> > > >
> > > Hi Thomas
> > > I think this patch code it is easy to review. If you busy, Could you
> > > let other IRQ maintainer review? Thanks.
> > >
> > > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn and Krzysztof
> >
> > Hi Minda,
> >
> > This patchset seems to have broken threading (lore, mailman). I have seen other
> > folks on IRC mentioning that too.
> >
> > I am not sure if that requires re-sending, but let's wait for others to comment.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > david
> >
> Do you mean the auto test error in linux-riscv?
> I can see that. But In v14 resend version, There is no error. Version 15 just add
> a new patch. Other no change. It is very strange.
> If not this error, I will waiting others comment.
V15 is wrongly threaded:
- Patch 2 has no In-Reply-To / In-Reply-To headers
- Patch 3 to 13 reference patch 2 instead of the cover letter
- Patch 14 has no In-Reply-To / In-Reply-To headers
- Patch 15 references patch 14 instead of the cover letter
- Patch 16 has no In-Reply-To / In-Reply-To headers
- Patch 17 to 23 reference patch 17 instead of the cover letter
Said otherwise, the patches appears as (sorry for the long lines):
[PATCH v15 00/23] Refactoring Microchip PCIe driver and add StarFive PCIe
└─>[PATCH v15 01/23] dt-bindings: PCI: Add PLDA XpressRICH PCIe host common properties
[PATCH v15 02/23] PCI: microchip: Move pcie-microchip-host.c to plda directory
├─>[PATCH v15 03/23] PCI: microchip: Move PLDA IP register macros to pcie-plda.h
├─>[PATCH v15 04/23] PCI: microchip: Add bridge_addr field to struct mc_pcie
├─>[PATCH v15 05/23] PCI: microchip: Rename two PCIe data structures
├─>[PATCH v15 06/23] PCI: microchip: Move PCIe host data structures to plda-pcie.h
├─>[PATCH v15 07/23] PCI: microchip: Rename two setup functions
├─>[PATCH v15 08/23] PCI: microchip: Change the argument of plda_pcie_setup_iomems()
├─>[PATCH v15 09/23] PCI: microchip: Move setup functions to pcie-plda-host.c
├─>[PATCH v15 10/23] PCI: microchip: Rename interrupt related functions
├─>[PATCH v15 11/23] PCI: microchip: Add num_events field to struct plda_pcie_rp
├─>[PATCH v15 12/23] PCI: microchip: Add request_event_irq() callback function
└─>[PATCH v15 13/23] PCI: microchip: Add INTx and MSI event num to struct plda_event
[PATCH v15 14/23] PCI: microchip: Add get_events() callback and add PLDA get_event()
└─>[PATCH v15 15/23] PCI: microchip: Add event irqchip field to host port and add PLDA irqchip
[PATCH v15 16/23] PCI: microchip: Move IRQ functions to pcie-plda-host.c
├─>[PATCH v15 17/23] PCI: plda: Add event bitmap field to struct plda_pcie_rp
├─>[PATCH v15 18/23] PCI: plda: Add host init/deinit and map bus functions
├─>[PATCH v15 19/23] dt-bindings: PCI: Add StarFive JH7110 PCIe controller
├─>[PATCH v15 20/23] PCI: Add PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS waiting time value
├─>[PATCH v15 21/23] PCI: starfive: Add JH7110 PCIe controller
├─>[PATCH v15 22/23] PCI: starfive: Offload the NVMe timeout workaround to host drivers.
└─>[PATCH v15 23/23] riscv: dts: starfive: add PCIe dts configuration for JH7110
I *think* it is the reason why some tools are not able to consider all
the patches as a single patchset.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx http://aurel32.net
