Re: [PATCH V4] PCI/ASPM: Update saved buffers with latest ASPM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 22-02-2024 23:50, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 2/22/24 9:44 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
Many PCIe device drivers save the configuration state of their respective
devices during probe and restore the same when their 'slot_reset' hook
is called through PCIe Error Recovery Handler.

If the system has a change in ASPM policy after the driver's probe is
called and before error event occurred, 'slot_reset' hook restores the
PCIe configuration state to what it was at the time of probe but not to
what it was just before the occurrence of the error event.
This effectively leads to a mismatch in the ASPM configuration between
the device and its upstream parent device.

Update the saved configuration state of the device with the latest info
whenever there is a change w.r.t ASPM policy.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V4:
* Rebased on top of pci/aspm branch

V3:
* Addressed sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy's review comments

V2:
* Rebased on top of the tree code
* Addressed Bjorn's review comments

  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index cfc5b84dc9c9..3db606ba9344 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
       pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, &cap[i++]);
       pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL2, &cap[i++]);

-     pci_save_aspm_state(dev);
+     pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(dev);
       pci_save_ltr_state(dev);

       return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index b217e74966eb..9fe78eb8b07d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void pci_msix_init(struct pci_dev *dev);
  bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *dev);
  void pci_bridge_d3_update(struct pci_dev *dev);
  void pci_aspm_get_l1ss(struct pci_dev *pdev);
-void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
is this rename a review request? It is not clear from the commit log
why you are doing it?
I rebased my changes on top of pci/aspm branch which got the support for
save/restore of ASPM L1-SubStates registers merged recently. As I see,
the name of the function that saves the L1SS registers is given as
pci_save_aspm_state() instead of pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(). My original
change already adds a function to save the ASPM state (only L0s and L1)
info from the link control register and I called it pci_save_aspm_state().
I thought it makes sense to use pci_save_aspm_state() for saving the info
of ASPM-L0s/L1 related registers whereas use pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state() to
save the info of ASPM-L1SS.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar

  void pci_restore_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
  void pci_save_ltr_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
  void pci_restore_ltr_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 7f1d674ff171..a62648dd52bc 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -24,13 +24,29 @@

  #include "../pci.h"

+static void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+     struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
+     u16 *cap;
+
+     if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
+             return;
+
+     save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
+     if (!save_state)
+             return;
+
+     cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
+     pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &cap[1]);
+}
+
  void pci_aspm_get_l1ss(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  {
       /* Read L1 PM substate capabilities */
       pdev->l1ss = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_L1SS);
  }

-void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  {
       struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
       u16 l1ss = pdev->l1ss;
@@ -309,10 +325,12 @@ static void pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
       struct pci_bus *linkbus = link->pdev->subordinate;
       u32 val = enable ? PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN : 0;

-     list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
+     list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
               pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
                                                  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN,
                                                  val);
+             pci_save_aspm_state(child);
+     }
       link->clkpm_enabled = !!enable;
  }

@@ -931,6 +949,12 @@ static void pcie_config_aspm_link(struct pcie_link_state *link, u32 state)
               pcie_config_aspm_dev(parent, upstream);

       link->aspm_enabled = state;
+
+     /* Update latest ASPM configuration in saved context */
+     pci_save_aspm_state(link->downstream);
+     pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(link->downstream);
+     pci_save_aspm_state(parent);
+     pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(parent);
  }

  static void pcie_config_aspm_path(struct pcie_link_state *link)
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer






[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux