On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:51:17AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:18:03AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:42:08PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:11:45AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > first 6 patches use drvdata: flags to simplify some switch-case code.
> > > > > Improve maintaince and easy to read code.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > @Lorenzo Pieralisi:
> > > >
> > > > Do you have chance to look other patches?
> > > > Mani's apply EP side change.
> > >
> > > Even though the controller is for the endpoint, it is still a controller
> > > driver. So all the patches should go through Lorenzo.
> > >
> > > I only merge patches under drivers/pci/endpoint. Hope this clarifies.
> >
> > Sorry. It confused everyone. My means was that Mani applied Niklas Cassel's
> > patches, which cause my 14th patch build failure.
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> Patch 14, which adds this:
>
> +static const struct pci_epc_features imx95_pcie_epc_features = {
> + .msi_capable = true,
> + .bar_fixed_size[1] = SZ_64K,
> + .align = SZ_4K,
> +};
>
>
> Should, after rebasing on Mani's pci/endpoint branch, instead look like this:
>
> +static const struct pci_epc_features imx95_pcie_epc_features = {
> + .msi_capable = true,
> + .bar[BAR_1] = { .type = BAR_FIXED, .fixed_size = SZ_64K, },
> + .align = SZ_4K,
> +};
>
>
> >
> > I asked if I need update my 14th patch or applied 1-13 only.
>
> I see, you want the maintainers to apply 1-13, and simply drop patch 14
> instead of you sending out a rebased series.
>
> I assume that the maintainers will be fine with your suggested approach.
If patch 14 has no dependencies on 1-13 yes; if it does we need to
coordinate the merge between branches in the PCI tree.
Lorenzo
