Re: [PATCH v1] PCI / PM: Really allow runtime PM without callback functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:06:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:02:33PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:

...

> > >  0)               |  pm_runtime_work() {
> > >  0)               |    rpm_idle() {
> > >  0)               |      rpm_check_suspend_allowed() {
> > >  0)   1.500 us    |        __dev_pm_qos_resume_latency(); /* = 0x7fffffff */
> > >  0)   4.840 us    |      } /* rpm_check_suspend_allowed = 0x0 */
> > >  0)   1.550 us    |      __rpm_get_callback(); /* = 0xffffffffb4bc84f0 */
> > >  0)   1.800 us    |      pci_pm_runtime_idle(); /* = -38 */
> > >  0) + 17.070 us   |    } /* rpm_idle = -38 */
> > >  0) + 22.450 us   |  } /* pm_runtime_work = -38 */
> > 
> > What is this timing information telling me?
> 
> It's a raw ftrace dump.

(Told ya that people would be surprised with this without seeing how you get
 this and what fields mean)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux