On 08/01/2024 11:20, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 08/01/24 12:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 08/01/2024 06:07, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: >>> Add the device-id of 0xb012 for the PCIe controller on the J784S4 SoC as >>> described in the CTRL_MMR_PCI_DEVICE_ID register's PCI_DEVICE_ID_DEVICE_ID >>> field. The Register descriptions and the Technical Reference Manual for >>> J784S4 SoC can be found at: https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spruj52 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> This patch is based on linux-next tagged next-20240105. >> >> Why is this patch incomplete? What is missing here? What are you asking >> about as RFC? > > Since the merge window is closed, I was hoping to get the patch reviewed in > order to get any "Reviewed-by" tags if possible. That way, I will be able to > post it again as v1 along with the tags when the merge window opens. For that This is v1, so that would be v2. > reason, I have marked it as an RFC patch. Is there an alternative to this "RFC > patch" method that I have followed? Please let me know. Then how does it differ from posting without RFC? Sorry, RFC is incomplete work. Often ignored during review. Best regards, Krzysztof
