> From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2023 8:17 AM
>
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static void __flush_svm_range_dev(struct intel_svm
> *svm,
>
> qi_flush_piotlb(sdev->iommu, sdev->did, svm->pasid, address, pages,
> ih);
> if (info->ats_enabled) {
> + info->iommu->flush_target_dev = info->dev;
> qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(sdev->iommu, sdev->sid, info-
> >pfsid,
> svm->pasid, sdev->qdep, address,
> order_base_2(pages));
this is wrong both in concept and function.
an iommu instance can be shared by many devices which may all have
ongoing ATS invalidation requests to handle. Using a per-iommu field
to store the flush target is limiting (and there is no lock protection at all).
if there is a real need of passing dev pointer to qi helpers, just change
the helper to accept an explicit parameter.
