Hi, On 12/23/23 10:44, attreyee-muk wrote: > Correct to “re-enabled” from “reenabled”. > > Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@xxxxxxxxx> Is "reenabled" confusing? I don't have a problem with it, but one web page [1] says that it's OK to use "re-" if not having the hyphen can be confusing. [1] https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/hyphens/hyphens-with-the-prefix-re/ OTOH, some web sites say the "reenable" is OK, at least as an alternative spelling. Thanks. > --- > Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst b/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst > index 2ec70121bfca..931077bb0953 100644 > --- a/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Conditions > ========== > > The use of threaded interrupts is the most likely condition to trigger > -this problem today. Threaded interrupts may not be reenabled after the IRQ > +this problem today. Threaded interrupts may not be re-enabled after the IRQ > handler wakes. These "one shot" conditions mean that the threaded interrupt > needs to keep the interrupt line masked until the threaded handler has run. > Especially when dealing with high data rate interrupts, the thread needs to -- #Randy https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
