Re: [PATCH v5 15/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add iMX95 pcie endpoint compatible string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/12/2023 22:36, Frank Li wrote:
> Add i.MX95 PCIe "fsl,imx95-pcie-ep" compatible string.
> Add reg-name: "atu", "dbi2", "dma" and "serdes".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Change from v1 to v3
>     - new patches at v3
> 
>  .../bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml       | 52 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> index ee155ed5f1811..be9ea77ce8548 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> @@ -22,14 +22,7 @@ properties:
>        - fsl,imx8mm-pcie-ep
>        - fsl,imx8mq-pcie-ep
>        - fsl,imx8mp-pcie-ep
> -
> -  reg:
> -    minItems: 2
> -
> -  reg-names:
> -    items:
> -      - const: dbi
> -      - const: addr_space

No, why? Entries should be defined top-level. If you remove them here,
where are they defined (in which schema)?


> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          enum:
> +            - fsl,imx95-pcie-ep
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        linux,pci-domain: true

Why? It is allowed already.


Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux