On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:24:04PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:02:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > Break up the newly added ASPM comment so that it fits within the soft 80 > > > > character limit and becomes more readable. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I think we discussed (80column soft limit for comments) in the past, but I don't > > > think breaking here makes the comment more readable. > > > > The coding style clearly states: > > > > The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns. > > > > Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks, > > unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does > > not hide information. > > > > Going beyond 80 chars may sometimes be warranted for code, but the > > exception is not intended for comments. > > Breaking the comment here is indeed making it hard to read. It's just one word > that needs to be broken if we go by 80 column limit and I won't prefer that, > sorry! Please read the above quote again, it is as clear as it gets. 80 chars is the preferred limit unless (for code) exceeding it *significantly* increases readability, which clearly isn't the case here (even if this exception applied to comments). I really don't understand why you keep insisting on this. Just fix your editor. Johan
