Hi! On 15.11.2023 07:40, Shradha Todi wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam [mailto:manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 27 October 2023 19:19 >> To: Shradha Todi<shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc:jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx;kw@xxxxxxxxx; >> robh@xxxxxxxxxx;bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx;krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx; >> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx;linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: exynos: Adapt to clk_bulk_* APIs >> >> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:52:16AM +0530, Shradha Todi wrote: >>> There is no need to hardcode the clock info in the driver as driver >>> can rely on the devicetree to supply the clocks required for the >>> functioning of the peripheral. Get rid of the static clock info and >>> obtain the platform supplied clocks. The total number of clocks >>> supplied is obtained using the devm_clk_bulk_get_all() API and used >>> for the rest of the clk_bulk_* APIs. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi<shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 46 >>> ++++++------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c >>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c >>> index 9e42cfcd99cc..023cf41fccd7 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c >>> @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ >>> struct exynos_pcie { >>> struct dw_pcie pci; >>> void __iomem *elbi_base; >>> - struct clk *clk; >>> - struct clk *bus_clk; >>> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks; >>> + int clk_cnt; >>> struct phy *phy; >>> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2]; >>> }; >>> @@ -65,30 +65,18 @@ static int exynos_pcie_init_clk_resources(struct >> exynos_pcie *ep) >>> struct device *dev = ep->pci.dev; >>> int ret; >>> >>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(ep->clk); >>> - if (ret) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "cannot enable pcie rc clock"); >>> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &ep->clks); >>> + if (ret < 0) >> Please use !(ret) here and below to be consistent with the driver. >> > In this case, only negative values indicate failure. Hence we cannot use (!ret) here. > >>> return ret; >>> - } >>> >>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(ep->bus_clk); >>> - if (ret) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "cannot enable pcie bus clock"); >>> - goto err_bus_clk; >>> - } >>> + ep->clk_cnt = ret; >> Since clk_cnt is "int", you can just use it directly instead of "ret". >> > Thanks for this suggestion! Will take care in v2. > >>> - return 0; >>> - >>> -err_bus_clk: >>> - clk_disable_unprepare(ep->clk); >>> - >>> - return ret; >>> + return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ep->clk_cnt, ep->clks); >>> } >>> >>> static void exynos_pcie_deinit_clk_resources(struct exynos_pcie *ep) >>> { >>> - clk_disable_unprepare(ep->bus_clk); >>> - clk_disable_unprepare(ep->clk); >>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ep->clk_cnt, ep->clks); >>> } >>> >>> static void exynos_pcie_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 reg) >>> @@ -332,17 +320,9 @@ static int exynos_pcie_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >>> if (IS_ERR(ep->elbi_base)) >>> return PTR_ERR(ep->elbi_base); >>> >>> - ep->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pcie"); >>> - if (IS_ERR(ep->clk)) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get pcie rc clock\n"); >>> - return PTR_ERR(ep->clk); >>> - } >>> - >>> - ep->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pcie_bus"); >>> - if (IS_ERR(ep->bus_clk)) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get pcie bus clock\n"); >>> - return PTR_ERR(ep->bus_clk); >>> - } >>> + ret = exynos_pcie_init_clk_resources(ep); >>> + if (ret < 0) >>> + return ret; >>> >>> ep->supplies[0].supply = "vdd18"; >>> ep->supplies[1].supply = "vdd10"; >>> @@ -351,10 +331,6 @@ static int exynos_pcie_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >>> if (ret) >>> return ret; >>> >>> - ret = exynos_pcie_init_clk_resources(ep); >>> - if (ret) >>> - return ret; >>> - >>> ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(ep->supplies), ep- >>> supplies); >>> if (ret) >> You need to disable_unprepare() clocks in error path here and above. >> > Thanks for pointing out! Will take care in v2. Maybe it would make sense to add devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled() to clock framework, similar to the existing devm_clk_get_enabled()? It is really a common pattern to get all clocks and enable them for the time of driver operation. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland