Re: [PATCH] [RFC] PCI, ACPI, x86: MMCFG support for hotpluggable PCI hostbridges on x86, x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you for your comment.

On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:31:57 +0900
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (2012/04/06 11:59), Taku Izumi wrote:
> >
> > This patch introduces the configuration for the base address of
> > the memory mapped configuration space (MMCFG) for hot pluggable PCI
> > hostbridges on x86 and x86_64.
> >
> > The MMCFG for hotplugable host bridges must be described by using
> > ACPI _CBA method. This patch adds implementation for _CBA method
> > on ACPI pci_root driver and MMCFG manipulating functons for x86 and
> > x86_64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi<izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   drivers/acpi/pci_root.c        |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   drivers/pci/pci.c              |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/acpi/acnames.h         |    1
> >   include/linux/pci.h            |    3 ++
> >   5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-next-build/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-next-build.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ linux-next-build/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
> >
> >   static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> >   {
> > -	unsigned long long segment, bus;
> > +	unsigned long long segment, bus, base_addr;
> >   	acpi_status status;
> >   	int result;
> >   	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> > @@ -506,6 +506,28 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(s
> >   	device->driver_data = root;
> >
> >   	/*
> > +	 * Check _CBA for hot pluggable host bridge
> > +	 */
> > +	base_addr = 0;
> > +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CBA, NULL,
> > +					&base_addr);
> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)&&  status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> > +		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _CBA\n");
> > +		result = -ENODEV;
> > +		goto end;
> > +	}
> > +	if (base_addr) {
> > +		if (pci_add_mmcfg_region(root->segment,
> > +					 root->secondary.start,
> > +					 root->secondary.end,
> > +					 base_addr) != 0) {
> > +			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't add MMCFG entry\n");
> > +			result = -ENODEV;
> > +			goto end;
> > +		}
> 
> how about
> 		result = pci_add_mmcfg_region()
> 		if (result) {
> 			printk();
> 			goto end;
> 		}
> ?

   I'll take in your good idea.

> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> >   	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> >   	 * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
> >   	 */
> > @@ -625,6 +647,8 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(s
> >   	return 0;
> >
> >   end:
> > +	if (base_addr)
> > +		pci_remove_mmcfg_region(root->segment, root->secondary.start);
> >   	if (!list_empty(&root->node))
> >   		list_del(&root->node);
> >   	kfree(root);
> > @@ -646,6 +670,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_remove(struct a
> >   	device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, false);
> >   	pci_acpi_remove_bus_pm_notifier(device);
> >
> > +	pci_remove_mmcfg_region(root->segment, root->secondary.start);
> > +
> >   	kfree(root);
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > Index: linux-next-build/include/acpi/acnames.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-next-build.orig/include/acpi/acnames.h
> > +++ linux-next-build/include/acpi/acnames.h
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
> >   #define METHOD_NAME__AEI        "_AEI"
> >   #define METHOD_NAME__PRW        "_PRW"
> >   #define METHOD_NAME__SRS        "_SRS"
> > +#define METHOD_NAME__CBA	"_CBA"
> >
> >   /* Method names - these methods must appear at the namespace root */
> >
> > Index: linux-next-build/include/linux/pci.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-next-build.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ linux-next-build/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -1460,6 +1460,9 @@ void pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_d
> >   void pcibios_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >   int pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state(struct pci_dev *dev,
> >   				 enum pcie_reset_state state);
> > +int pci_add_mmcfg_region(int segment, int start,
> > +			 int end, u64 addr);
> > +void pci_remove_mmcfg_region(int segment, int bus);
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
> >   extern void __init pci_mmcfg_early_init(void);
> > Index: linux-next-build/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-next-build.orig/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > +++ linux-next-build/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int __initdata pci_mmcfg_resource
> >
> >   LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
> >
> > -static __init void pci_mmconfig_remove(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
> > +static __devinit void pci_mmconfig_remove(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
> >   {
> >   	if (cfg->res.parent)
> >   		release_resource(&cfg->res);
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static __init void free_all_mmcfg(void)
> >   		pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
> >   }
> >
> > -static __init void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
> > +static __devinit void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
> >   {
> >   	struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> >
> > @@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ static __init void list_add_sorted(struc
> >   	list_add_tail(&new->list,&pci_mmcfg_list);
> >   }
> >
> > -static __init struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_add(int segment, int start,
> > -							int end, u64 addr)
> > +static __devinit struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_add(int segment,
> > +							   int start,
> > +							   int end,
> > +							   u64 addr)
> >   {
> >   	struct pci_mmcfg_region *new;
> >   	struct resource *res;
> > @@ -108,6 +110,33 @@ struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_lo
> >   	return NULL;
> >   }
> >
> > +int pci_add_mmcfg_region(int segment, int start, int end, u64 addr)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> > +
> > +	cfg = pci_mmconfig_add(segment, start, end, addr);
> > +	if (!cfg) {
> > +		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
> > +			"no memory for MMCFG entry\n");
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> 
> We need to check if the region is valid (if the region is
> reserved in ACPI motherborad resource).


	I'll add the code to sanity check.
> 
> > +
> > +	insert_resource(&iomem_resource,&cfg->res);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pci_remove_mmcfg_region(int segment, int bus)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> > +
> > +	cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(segment, bus);
> > +	if (!cfg)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static const char __init *pci_mmcfg_e7520(void)
> >   {
> >   	u32 win;
> > @@ -357,8 +386,10 @@ static void __init pci_mmcfg_insert_reso
> >   {
> >   	struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> >
> > -	list_for_each_entry(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list)
> > -		insert_resource(&iomem_resource,&cfg->res);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
> 
> We need to add lock for manipulating pci_mmcfg_list.
> 
> > +		if (!cfg->res.parent)
> 
> Why do we need this line?
> 
> Regards,
> Kenji Kaneshige
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux