Re: [PATCH v5 13/44] i2c: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:01:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> In RFC v1, you agreed to drop PARPORT [1]. Is there a reason you haven't
> done this so far?
> [1]

Shall I apply this with or without PARPORT?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux