>
> The architecture specific code will determine whether the IRQ could be migrated
> in process context. For example, the IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT flag will be set on x86
> systems if interrupt remapping is enabled.
Actually I am encountering this issue with x86, and see different behavior with different
HW devices (NICs). On same machine I have one device that responds immediately to affinity changes
while the other one changes the affinity only after first interrupt.
>
> On 03/26/2012 10:28 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [This is not really a PCI question, so +cc Thomas, LKML.]
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Yevgeny Petrilin
> > <yevgenyp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm working on an issue where affinity changes to IRQ only have effect after the first interrupt which still happens on the original core.
> >> I understand that the decision regarding it takes place in this code:
> >>
> >> if (irq_can_move_pcntxt(data)) {
> >> ret = chip->irq_set_affinity(data, mask, false);
> >> switch (ret) {
> >> case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK:
> >> cpumask_copy(data->affinity, mask);
> >> case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
> >> irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
> >> ret = 0;
> >> }
> >> } else {
> >> irqd_set_move_pending(data);
> >> irq_copy_pending(desc, mask);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Which means that the "IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT" flag is not set in irq_data->state_use_accessors.
> >> I was able to add this flag using irq_modify_status(), which is probably not the way to go.
> >> This option also doesn't exist in older kernels (2.6.32)
> >>
> >> So the question is, when irq_desc is created, how is it determined that "IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT" flag is set?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Yevgeny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
