Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Add interconnect bandwidth for PCIe Gen4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 06:07:13PM +0200, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> PCIe Gen4 supports the interconnect bandwidth of 1969 MBps. So let's add
> the bandwidth support in the driver. Otherwise, the default bandwidth of
> 985 MBps will be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 297442c969b6..6853123f92c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -1384,11 +1384,14 @@ static void qcom_pcie_icc_update(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>  	case 2:
>  		bw = MBps_to_icc(500);
>  		break;
> +	case 3:
> +		bw = MBps_to_icc(985);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>  		fallthrough;
> -	case 3:
> -		bw = MBps_to_icc(985);
> +	case 4:
> +		bw = MBps_to_icc(1969);

The bare numbers here are sort of weird.  I assume they correspond to
the Supported Link Speeds Vector in Link Cap 2, and I expected them to
correspond somehow to PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC(), which computes the usable
PCIe bandwidth per lane.  I see the ratios between 250, 500, 986, 1969
*do* match up with the ratios of PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC() values, but I
don't know the PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC() values aren't used:

            SLS Vector                         PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC()
  CLS 1:  bit 0  2.5 GT/s   MBps_to_icc(250)      2000 Mbps
  CLS 2:  bit 1  5.0 GT/s   MBps_to_icc(500)      4000 Mbps
  CLS 3:  bit 2  8.0 GT/s   MBps_to_icc(985)      7879 Mbps
  CLS 4:  bit 3 16.0 GT/s   MBps_to_icc(1969)    15753 Mbps

This is just my curiosity, probably no change is needed, or at most a
short comment.

I do notice that pcie-qcom-ep.c uses #defines like PCIE_GEN1_BW_MBPS,
and it seems like both could use the same style.

Also agree with Konrad that the ordering ends up looking unusual;
maybe would be more readable if the default case repeated the speed
you want instead of using the fallthrough.

>  		break;
>  	}



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux