[PATCH v13 02/12] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



With nested #ifdef statements it's sometimes difficult to tell
which code goes with which statement.
* One comment said it was for the end of a CONFIG_X86 block,
  which was wrong as it was actually a CONFIG_IA64 block.
* Another block for CONFIG_ACPI didn't have a comment.

Fix the comment for the CONFIG_IA64 block and add a comment
for the CONFIG_ACPI block.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
v12->v13:
 * Commit message improvements
v9->v10:
 * no changes
---
 include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 641dc48439873..0d5277b7c6323 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1117,10 +1117,10 @@ static inline void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,
 					  size_t size)
 {
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
+#endif /* CONFIG_IA64 */
 #else
 #define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while (0)
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM)
 int acpi_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, bool wakeup);
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux