On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:05:12AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:28:51PM -0400, Alistair Francis wrote: > > v3: > > - Expose each DOE feature as a separate file > > But you don't actually have anything in the sysfs files, why not? He wants to expose a list of supported protocols. He first exposed the list in a single attribute, separated by newlines. Which made sense because it allows users to grep for a specific protocol. You told him not to expose multiple values in a single attribute. So he's exposing the available protocols each in an empty file. The file name contains the protocol. You got what you asked for. ;) > > --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > > @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ struct pci_doe_mb { > > wait_queue_head_t wq; > > struct workqueue_struct *work_queue; > > unsigned long flags; > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > > + struct device_attribute *sysfs_attrs; > > +#endif > > Please don't put #ifdefs in .c files if you can prevent it. I think > this will work just fine if you don't have the #ifdef. And who would be > using pci without sysfs? People with space-constrained devices such as routers. It is perfectly legal to compile a kernel with CONFIG_PCI=y and CONFIG_SYSFS=n. And it is reasonable not to include code in the kernel which has specifically been deselected in the kernel config. Thanks, Lukas