On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why did you just repeat my proposal, changing "err" to "ret"? I > missed the point you're trying to make. The name "err" gives an > important clue that device_schedule_callback() returns 0 or errno. > That's essential to understanding the code. > > Your original patch has one "return." Mine proposal has three. All > that means is that the reader of your patch has to manage more stuff > in her head to understand the code. That's not a benefit! ok, can we have separated patch to fix them all? Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
