On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:59:56 -0400 Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:51:53 -0400 > > Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>> Changelog: > >>> * split out debug patch into a separate one with extra printk added > >>> * fixed inverte bus->self check (probably a reason why it didn't work before) > >>> > >>> > >>> 1/3 debug patch > >>> 2/3 offending patch > >>> 3/3 potential fix > >>> > >>> I added more files to trace, add following to kernel CLI > >>> dyndbg="file drivers/pci/access.c +p; file drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +p; file drivers/pci/bus.c +p; file drivers/pci/pci.c +p; file drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +p; file drivers/acpi/bus.c +p" ignore_loglevel > >>> > >>> should be applied on top of > >>> e8afd0d9fccc PCI: pciehp: Cancel bringup sequence if card is not present > >>> > >>> apply a patch one by one and run testcase + capture dmesg after each patch > >>> one shpould endup with 3 dmesg to ananlyse > >>> 1st - old behaviour - no crash > >>> 2nd - crash > >>> 3rd - no crash hopefully > >>> > >>> Igor Mammedov (3): > >>> acpiphp: extra debug hack > >>> PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary > >>> acpipcihp: use __pci_bus_assign_resources() if bus doesn't have bridge > >>> > >>> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >> Actually applying patch1 is already creating the crash (why???), > > probably it's due to an extra debug line, I've added. > > I dropped suspicions one, can you try again and see if it works. > > > >> hence I > >> have added also dmesg-6.5-0.txt which shows a working condition based on > >> git e8afd0d9fccc level (acpiphp_glue in kernel 6.4) > >> > >> Patch3 did not fix the issue, it seems that the culprit is somewhere > >> else triggered by "benign" patch1 :-( > >> > >> Also note about the trigger description in patch3: the dmesg trace on > >> Inspiron laptop is collected after the first wake from suspend to ram. > >> The consecutive attempt to sleep results in a frozen system. > > Thanks for clarification, I'll correct commit message once culprit > > is found. > > > Good news. After removing the botched debug statement which was masking > the original issue, the testing went as you have predicted, and on patch > 3 system suspends to RAM OK. Thanks for confirmation, I'll post cleaned up 3/3 patch today. > > Here are the requested 3 dmesg outputs, #2 is for the bad run. > > I can retest with a final version of the patch once you have it ready... > > Thanks, Woody >