> -----Original Message----- > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-fei.zang=freescale.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-fei.zang=freescale.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Kumar Gala > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 20:14 PM > To: Zhao Chenhui-B35336 > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] pci_ids: Add device ID for IBM PCI-X bridge > > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Just merge this with the 2nd patch that actually uses the ID. Why does this necessary? I'd prefer using a separate patch for the PCI ID. Roy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
