Hello Serge,
> From: Serge Semin, Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 9:11 PM
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:47:16AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Hello Serge,
> >
> > > From: Serge Semin, Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 9:16 PM
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:59:20AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > Hello Serge,
> > > >
> > > > > From: Serge Semin, Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 11:39 PM
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:22:31PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > > > Add R-Car Gen4 PCIe Host support. This controller is based on
> > > > > > Synopsys DesignWare PCIe, but this controller has vendor-specific
> > > > > > registers so that requires initialization code like mode setting
> > > > > > and retraining and so on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To reduce code delta, adds some helper functions which are used by
> > > > > > both the host driver and the endpoint driver (which is added
> > > > > > immediately afterwards) into a separate file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 9 +
> > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +
> > > > > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4-host.c | 141 +++++++++++++
> > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.h | 46 +++++
> > > > > > 5 files changed, 388 insertions(+)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4-host.c
> > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > > index ab96da43e0c2..64d4d37bc891 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > > @@ -415,4 +415,13 @@ config PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST
> > > > > > Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Toshiba Visconti SoC.
> > > > > > This driver supports TMPV7708 SoC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +config PCIE_RCAR_GEN4
> > > > > > + tristate "Renesas R-Car Gen4 PCIe Host controller"
> > > > > > + depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
> > > > > > + depends on PCI_MSI
> > > > > > + select PCIE_DW_HOST
> > > > > > + help
> > > > > > + Say Y here if you want PCIe host controller support on R-Car Gen4 SoCs.
> > > > > > + This uses the DesignWare core.
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > endmenu
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > > index bf5c311875a1..486cf706b53d 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST) += pcie-visconti.o
> > > > > > +pcie-rcar-gen4-host-drv-objs := pcie-rcar-gen4.o pcie-rcar-gen4-host.o
> > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_GEN4) += pcie-rcar-gen4-host-drv.o
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI
> > > > > > # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access.
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4-host.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4-host.c
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 000000000000..df7d80f1874f
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4-host.c
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
> > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * PCIe host controller driver for Renesas R-Car Gen4 Series SoCs
> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Renesas Electronics Corporation
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include "pcie-rcar-gen4.h"
> > > > > > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct dw_pcie *dw = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > + u32 val;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw->pe_rst, 1);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret = rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type(rcar, true, dw->num_lanes);
> > > > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(dw);
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you sure dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en() and dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis() are
> > > > > needed? In accordance with the DW PCIe Dual-mode HW manual the BARx
> > > > > registers are W-only over the DBI2 map with no need in setting the
> > > > > DBI_RO_WR_EN flag.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please check that on your hardware.
> > > >
> > > > You're correct. They are not needed. So, I'll drop this on v17.
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * According to the section 3.5.7.2 "RC Mode" in DWC PCIe Dual Mode
> > > > > > + * Rev.5.20a, we should disable two BARs to avoid unnecessary memory
> > > > > > + * assignment during device enumeration.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(dw, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 0x0);
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(dw, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1, 0x0);
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(dw);
> > > > >
> > > > > ditto
> > > >
> > > > I'll drop this too.
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > > > > > + /* Enable MSI interrupt signal */
> > > > > > + val = readl(rcar->base + PCIEINTSTS0EN);
> > > > > > + val |= MSI_CTRL_INT;
> > > > > > + writel(val, rcar->base + PCIEINTSTS0EN);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + msleep(100); /* pe_rst requires 100msec delay */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw->pe_rst, 0);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops rcar_gen4_pcie_host_ops = {
> > > > > > + .host_init = rcar_gen4_pcie_host_init,
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_add_dw_pcie_rp(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar,
> > > > > > + struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct dw_pcie *dw = &rcar->dw;
> > > > > > + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &dw->pp;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + pp->num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
> > > > > > + pp->ops = &rcar_gen4_pcie_host_ops;
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_cap_set(dw, REQ_RES);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void rcar_gen4_remove_dw_pcie_rp(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_host_deinit(&rcar->dw.pp);
> > > > > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rcar->dw.pe_rst, 1);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar;
> > > > > > + int err;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar = rcar_gen4_pcie_devm_alloc(dev);
> > > > > > + if (!rcar)
> > > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + err = rcar_gen4_pcie_get_resources(rcar, pdev);
> > > > > > + if (err < 0) {
> > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request resource: %d\n", err);
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rcar);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + err = rcar_gen4_pcie_prepare(rcar);
> > > > > > + if (err < 0)
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar->needs_retrain = true;
> > > > > > + err = rcar_gen4_add_dw_pcie_rp(rcar, pdev);
> > > > > > + if (err < 0)
> > > > > > + goto err_add;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +err_add:
> > > > > > + rcar_gen4_pcie_unprepare(rcar);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar_gen4_remove_dw_pcie_rp(rcar);
> > > > > > + rcar_gen4_pcie_unprepare(rcar);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id rcar_gen4_pcie_of_match[] = {
> > > > > > + { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen4-pcie", },
> > > > > > + {},
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static struct platform_driver rcar_gen4_pcie_driver = {
> > > > > > + .driver = {
> > > > > > + .name = "pcie-rcar-gen4",
> > > > > > + .of_match_table = rcar_gen4_pcie_of_match,
> > > > > > + .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> > > > > > + },
> > > > > > + .probe = rcar_gen4_pcie_probe,
> > > > > > + .remove = rcar_gen4_pcie_remove,
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +module_platform_driver(rcar_gen4_pcie_driver);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Renesas R-Car Gen4 PCIe host controller driver");
> > > > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 000000000000..35923fda8ed5
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
> > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * PCIe host/endpoint controller driver for Renesas R-Car Gen4 Series SoCs
> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Renesas Electronics Corporation
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include "pcie-rcar-gen4.h"
> > > > > > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/* Renesas-specific */
> > > > > > +#define PCIERSTCTRL1 0x0014
> > > > > > +#define APP_HOLD_PHY_RST BIT(16)
> > > > > > +#define APP_LTSSM_ENABLE BIT(0)
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define RETRAIN_MAX_CHECK 10
> > > > > > +#define RETRAIN_MAX_RETRIES 10
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void rcar_gen4_pcie_ltssm_enable(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar,
> > > > > > + bool enable)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + u32 val;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + val = readl(rcar->base + PCIERSTCTRL1);
> > > > > > + if (enable) {
> > > > > > + val |= APP_LTSSM_ENABLE;
> > > > >
> > > > > > + val &= ~APP_HOLD_PHY_RST;
> > > > >
> > > > > What about moving the APP_HOLD_PHY_RST de-assertion to the
> > > > > rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type() method? In accordance with the
> > > > > "3.1 Initialization" chapter it's supposed to be done before
> > > > > performing the DBI programming and activating the link training.
> > > >
> > >
> > > > IIUC, the "3.1 Initialization" said app_hold_phy_rst = 1 before
> > > > performing the DBI programming. So, it is assertion. Also, the SoC
> > > > documentation described the initializing procedure as the follows:
> > > > app_ltssm_enable = 1
> > > > app_hold_phy_rst = 0
> > > > So, I would like to keep them in the function.
> > >
> > > Indeed. I was wrong. Sorry for the misleading comment.
> >
> > No problem. Thank you for the confirmation!
> >
> > > >
> > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > + val &= ~APP_LTSSM_ENABLE;
> > > > > > + val |= APP_HOLD_PHY_RST;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + writel(val, rcar->base + PCIERSTCTRL1);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static bool rcar_gen4_pcie_check_retrain_link(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(dw, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> > > > > > + u32 lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > > > > > + u32 lnkctl = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
> > > > > > + u16 lnksta = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> > > > > > + int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > + if ((lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS) == (lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS))
> > > > > > + return true;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + lnkctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnkctl);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < RETRAIN_MAX_CHECK; i++) {
> > > > > > + lnksta = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> > > > > > + if (lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT)
> > > > > > + return true;
> > > > > > + usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll ask one more time because you didn't respond to my previous note
> > > > > about this.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry. I completely overlooked the previous note.
> > > >
> > > > > Are you sure that this is needed? Did you try
> > > > > the approach described in "3.13 Gen2/3/4/5 Speed Modes" with
> > > > > de-asserting/asserting the GEN2_CTRL_OFF.DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag?
> > > >
> > > > I tried this setting, but it doesn't work. I'll investigate this setting more.
> > > >
> > > > > I keep asking because the same problem we used to have on our hardware
> > > > > until we found out that the DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag helped to train
> > > > > the link right to the speed specified in the capabilities.
> > > > >
> > > > > So here is what presumably you'll need to do (based on the
> > > > > "3.1 Initialization" and "3.13 Gen2/3/4/5 Speed Modes" chapters of
> > > > > the DW PCIe DM hw-manual):
> > > > > 1. Make sure the controller is in the power-down/reset state.
> > > > > 2. Select device_type (EP or RP).
> > > > > 3. De-assert the controller reset.
> > > > > 4. Clear PHY-reset flag in the app registers.
> > > > > 5. Perform some controller initializations.
> > > > > 6. Enable LTSSM to start link training.
> > > > > 7. Set GEN2_CTRL_OFF.DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag one more time.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1-4 are supposed to be done in rcar_gen4_pcie_host_init().
> > > > > 5 is performed in the framework of the DW PCIe core driver.
> > > > > 6-7 should be done in rcar_gen4_pcie_start_link().
> > > > >
> > > > > Note 1. GEN2_CTRL_OFF.DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag is already set on stage
> > > > > 5 in the framework of the dw_pcie_setup_rc() method. But in our case
> > > > > it only caused having the Gen.2 link speed. Adding stage 7 helped to
> > > > > get stable Gen.3 link. So please try the denoted approach. If it works
> > > > > what about adding stage 7 twice in order to get Gen.4 speed?
> > > > > (waiting for the DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag being auto-cleared and then
> > > > > set it up again?)
> > > > >
> > > > > Note 2. GEN2_CTRL_OFF.DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE flag is defined as
> > > > > PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL.PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE macros in the DW
> > > > > PCIe core driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note 3. If what is suggested above works well then you won't need to
> > > > > have the heavy rcar_gen4_pcie_check_retrain_link() method in the way
> > > > > you have it defined.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much for your comments!
> > >
> > > Please see the GEN2_CTRL_OFF.DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE description for details
> > > of how the flag is supposed to be de-asserted and asserted in order to
> > > initiate the direct speed change.
> >
> > After I modified the start_link() like below, it also works. Is the code
> > acceptable? (Sorry all tabs are replaced to spaces...)
>
> Looks good, but still there are some questions.
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > static bool rcar_gen4_pcie_check_current_link(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > {
> > u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(dw, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> > u32 lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > u16 lnksta = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(dw, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> >
>
> > if ((lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS) == (lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS))
> > return true;
>
> AFAICS depending on the link partner speed capabilities this may never
> happen.
>
> PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS - Max Link Speed. This field indicates the maximum Link
> speed of the associated Port.
> PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS - Current Link Speed. This field indicates the negotiated
> Link speed of the given PCI Express Link
>
> What if a link partner has the speed capability weaker than the link
> speed of the Root Port? If so then the current link speed will never
> reach the max link speed value.
Thank you very much for your comments! You're correct. This code cannot
work correctly if a link partner has the speed capability weaker than the link speed...
> Of course this can be fixed by specifying a correct "max-link-speed"
> property, but what if a platform has a cold-swappable port connected to
> the root port? Since any device can be attached you'll never be able
> to predict its capabilities beforahead.
You're correct. So, I'll fix the code somehow.
> >
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > static void rcar_gen4_pcie_speed_change(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > {
> > u32 val;
> >
> > val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(dw, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
> > val &= ~PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val);
> >
> > val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(dw, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
> > val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val);
> > }
> >
> > static int rcar_gen4_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > {
> > struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> > int i;
> >
> > rcar_gen4_pcie_ltssm_enable(rcar, true);
> >
> > /*
> > * Require direct speed change here. Otherwise RDLH_LINK_UP of
> > * PCIEINTSTS0 which is this controller specific register may not
> > * be set.
> > */
>
> > if (rcar->needs_speed_change) {
>
> Seeing this is specified for the root port only what about
> replacing the statement with just test whether the rcar_gen4_pcie.mode ==
> DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE? Thus you'll be ablt to drop the needs_speed_change field.
Thank you for the comment. I'll fix it.
> BTW Just curious. Why is the loop below enabled for the Root Port
> only? What about the end-point controller? It's the same hardware
> after all..
This is reused from v16 and then it used "link retraining" which is only for
the Root Port. As you mentioned, it seems endpoint controller is also needed
if we use direct speed change.
> > for (i = 0; i < SPEED_CHANGE_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
> > rcar_gen4_pcie_speed_change(dw);
> > msleep(100);
> > if (rcar_gen4_pcie_check_current_link(dw))
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Did you trace how many iterations this loop normally takes?
i = 0 or 1 (if the max-link-speed is suitable for a connected device.)
> Is it
> constant or varies for the same platform setup and a connected link
> partner? Does the number of iterations depend on the target link speed
> specified via the "max-link-speed" property?
This is not related to the "max-link-speed". It seems to related to
a link partner.
LinkCap max-link-speed loop
Device A 4 4 1
Device A 4 3 1
Device B 3 3 0
> I am just trying to understand whether we can completely get rid from
> the rcar_gen4_pcie_check_current_link() method and have it replaced
> with several rcar_gen4_pcie_speed_change() calls. The current link
> state would have been checked in the framework of the
> dw_pcie_wait_for_link() method which calls dw_pcie_link_up() and your
> rcar_gen4_pcie_link_up() in order to make sure the link is actually up.
Thank you for your comment! I'll investigate it.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> -Serge(y)
>
> >
> > return -ETIMEDOUT; /* Failed */
> > }
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return false;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> > > > > > + u32 val, mask;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + val = readl(rcar->base + PCIEINTSTS0);
> > > > > > + mask = RDLH_LINK_UP | SMLH_LINK_UP;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return (val & mask) == mask;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> > > > > > + int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar_gen4_pcie_ltssm_enable(rcar, true);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * Require retraining here. Otherwise RDLH_LINK_UP of PCIEINTSTS0 which
> > > > > > + * is this controller specific register may not be set.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + if (rcar->needs_retrain) {
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < RETRAIN_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
> > > > > > + if (rcar_gen4_pcie_check_retrain_link(dw))
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > + msleep(100);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return -ETIMEDOUT; /* Failed */
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void rcar_gen4_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *dw)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar_gen4_pcie_ltssm_enable(rcar, false);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar, bool rc,
> > > > > > + int num_lanes)
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Number of lanes is already defined in the rcar_gen4_pcie.dw.num_lanes field.
> > > > > What about using it from there instead of passing it as an argument?
> > > > > 2. DW PCIe core driver has a very handy enum defined:
> > > > > dw_pcie_device_mode. It describes the controller modes (End-point,
> > > > > Root port, etc). What about adding the mode field right to the
> > > > > rcar_gen4_pcie structure and initializing it in someplace in probe() ?
> > > > > 3. Based on the function semantic it's better to be named as something
> > > > > like rcar_gen4_pcie_init_device() or even rcar_gen4_pcie_basic_init().
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your comments! I'll modify the function.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + u32 val;
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > + /* Note: Assume the rcar->rst which is Cold-reset is asserted here */
> > > > >
> > > > > What about directly asserting it here then? In accordance with the DW
> > > > > PCIe DM manual the "device_type" input must be set before the DM
> > > > > controller is powered up (basically un-reset). What if the controller
> > > > > reset is already de-asserted, but you are going to changes its mode?
> > > > > In that case the mode won't be changed and you'll end up with
> > > > > unpredictable results.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your comment. We should add asserting it here as you mentioned.
> > > >
> > > > > > + val = readl(rcar->base + PCIEMSR0);
> > > > > > + if (rc)
> > > > > > + val |= DEVICE_TYPE_RC;
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + val |= DEVICE_TYPE_EP;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (num_lanes < 4)
> > > > > > + val |= BIFUR_MOD_SET_ON;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + writel(val, rcar->base + PCIEMSR0);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return reset_control_deassert(rcar->rst);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_prepare(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct device *dev = rcar->dw.dev;
> > > > > > + int err;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > > > > > + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> > > > > > + if (err < 0) {
> > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to resume/get Runtime PM\n");
> > > > > > + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +void rcar_gen4_pcie_unprepare(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct device *dev = rcar->dw.dev;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!reset_control_status(rcar->rst))
> > > > > > + reset_control_assert(rcar->rst);
> > > > > > + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> > > > > > + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_get_resources(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar,
> > > > > > + struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct device *dev = rcar->dw.dev;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* Renesas-specific registers */
> > > > > > + rcar->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "app");
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(rcar->base))
> > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(rcar->base);
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > + rcar->rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(rcar->rst)) {
> > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get Cold-reset\n");
> > > > >
> > > > > So AFAICS your platform is equipped with the DWC_pcie_clkrst.v module.
> > > > > Thus all the resets are appropriately cleared by a single flag:
> > > > > power_up_rst_n. What about using the named reset in this case with the
> > > > > "pwr" name? Thus you'll be able to drop the manual
> > > > > devm_reset_control_get() invocation and instead use the reset-resources
> > > > > requested in the framework of the generic dw_pcie_get_resources()
> > > > > method? Note you'll need to move the dw_pcie_cap_set(dw, REQ_RES);
> > > > > statement to rcar_gen4_pcie_devm_alloc() then and drop the
> > > > > rcar_gen4_pcie.rst field afterwords.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your suggestion! Using "pwr" can work on my environment.
> > > >
> > > > > By the way I don't see you requesting and enabling the reference
> > > > > clock in your driver but the bindings imply the clock source. How
> > > > > come?
> > > >
> > >
> > > > For now, I used gpio-hog to enable the reference clock. But, it seem
> > > > I should use "ref" clock for it. So, I'll fix it too.
> > >
> > > Not sure what gpio-hog you are talking about. Do you mean the pe_rst
> > > signal or some another gpio? I failed to see of how pe_rst is
> > > connected to the clock source. In anyway directly handling the clock
> > > source would be more portable choice.
> >
> > Sorry for lacking information. I described a gpio node like below
> > and then the gpio will be high automatically, and the reference clock
> > will be output. But, this is completely independent from pci.
> > ---
> > &gpio2 {
> > pci-clkreq0-hog {
> > gpio-hog;
> > gpios = <15 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > output-high;
> > };
> > };
> > ---
> >
> > Now I could implement the clock handling by using "gpio-gate-clock".
> > So, I'll drop the gpio-hog for the reference clock.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yoshihiro Shimoda
> >
> > > -Serge(y)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(rcar->rst);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> > > > > > + .start_link = rcar_gen4_pcie_start_link,
> > > > > > + .stop_link = rcar_gen4_pcie_stop_link,
> > > > > > + .link_up = rcar_gen4_pcie_link_up,
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar_gen4_pcie_devm_alloc(struct device *dev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rcar), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > > + if (!rcar)
> > > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rcar->dw.dev = dev;
> > > > > > + rcar->dw.ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
> > > > > > + dw_pcie_cap_set(&rcar->dw, EDMA_UNROLL);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return rcar;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.h
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 000000000000..fec3f18609f4
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.h
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * PCIe host/endpoint controller driver for Renesas R-Car Gen4 Series SoCs
> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Renesas Electronics Corporation
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#ifndef _PCIE_RCAR_GEN4_H_
> > > > > > +#define _PCIE_RCAR_GEN4_H_
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/* Renesas-specific */
> > > > > > +#define PCIEMSR0 0x0000
> > > > > > +#define BIFUR_MOD_SET_ON BIT(0)
> > > > > > +#define DEVICE_TYPE_EP 0
> > > > > > +#define DEVICE_TYPE_RC BIT(4)
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define PCIEINTSTS0 0x0084
> > > > > > +#define PCIEINTSTS0EN 0x0310
> > > > > > +#define MSI_CTRL_INT BIT(26)
> > > > > > +#define SMLH_LINK_UP BIT(7)
> > > > > > +#define RDLH_LINK_UP BIT(6)
> > > > > > +#define PCIEDMAINTSTSEN 0x0314
> > > > > > +#define PCIEDMAINTSTSEN_INIT GENMASK(15, 0)
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > > +struct rcar_gen4_pcie {
> > > > >
> > > > > As I mentioned above this structure can be extended with the enum
> > > > > dw_pcie_device_mode field thus dropping the boolean argument from the
> > > > > rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type() method.
> > > >
> > > > I got it. I'll fix this.
> > > >
> > > > > > + struct dw_pcie dw;
> > > > >
> > > > > As I already mentioned above the dw.num_lanes could be used instead of
> > > > > passing it as the rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type() argument.
> > > >
> > > > I'll fix this too.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Yoshihiro Shimoda
> > > >
> > > > > -Serge(y)
> > > > >
> > > > > > + void __iomem *base;
> > > > > > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > > > > > + bool needs_retrain;
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +#define to_rcar_gen4_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_set_device_type(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar, bool rc,
> > > > > > + int num_lanes);
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_prepare(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *pcie);
> > > > > > +void rcar_gen4_pcie_unprepare(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *pcie);
> > > > > > +int rcar_gen4_pcie_get_resources(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar,
> > > > > > + struct platform_device *pdev);
> > > > > > +struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar_gen4_pcie_devm_alloc(struct device *dev);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#endif /* _PCIE_RCAR_GEN4_H_ */
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > >
