Hello Serge,
> From: Serge Semin, Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 9:26 AM
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:14:26AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Hello Serge,
> >
> > > From: Serge Semin, Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 7:51 AM
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:22:13PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > Add macros defining Maximum Link Width bits in Link Capabilities
> > > > Register.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > You haven't been using these macros in the following up patches since
> > > v9. Why do you keep submitting this change then? I would suggest to
> > > drop the patch especially seeing the PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW field directly
> > > encodes the link width thus these macros unlikely will be of much use.
> >
> > Thank you for your review! You're correct. I didn't realized that
> > the macros were not used on the patch series..
> >
> > However, I also realized that the patch 11/22 used the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW_SHIFT
> > macro for the PCI_EXP_LNKCAP register. So, I'm thinking that I should modify
> > this patch as adding PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_SHIFT instead. But, what do you think?
> >
> > --- on the patch 11/22 ---
> > > + cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> > > + val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > > + val &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW;
> > > + val |= num_lanes << PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW_SHIFT;
> >
> > Perhaps, this should be PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_SHIFT instead.
>
> I'll get to that patch tomorrow, but in any case there is no need in
> defining an additional macro here. There is a handy helper FIELD_PREP()
> for that: FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_MLW, num_lanes).
Thank you for the reply. TBH, I didn't know the helper FIELD_PREP(),
but now I understood it. Since the pci_regs.h has already had
the PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW macro, we don't need to add any macro here.
> IMO for the same reason the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW_* macros are
> unnecessary and can be easily either dropped or replaced by the
> FIELD_{PREP,GET} macros usage.
I got it.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> -Serge(y)
>
> > ---
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yoshihiro Shimoda
> >
> > > -Serge(y)
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > > index dc2000e0fe3a..5d48413ac28f 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > > @@ -538,6 +538,12 @@
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_16_0GB 0x00000004 /* LNKCAP2 SLS Vector bit 3 */
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_32_0GB 0x00000005 /* LNKCAP2 SLS Vector bit 4 */
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_64_0GB 0x00000006 /* LNKCAP2 SLS Vector bit 5 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X1 0x00000010 /* Maximum Link Width x1 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X2 0x00000020 /* Maximum Link Width x2 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X4 0x00000040 /* Maximum Link Width x4 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X8 0x00000080 /* Maximum Link Width x8 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X12 0x000000c0 /* Maximum Link Width x12 */
> > > > +#define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW_X16 0x00000100 /* Maximum Link Width x16 */
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW 0x000003f0 /* Maximum Link Width */
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPMS 0x00000c00 /* ASPM Support */
> > > > #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPM_L0S 0x00000400 /* ASPM L0s Support */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
