On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 07:51:42PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > [AMD Official Use Only - General] > > +stable, Sasha > > > > Together with this patch there are now at least two regressions if > > > -rc1 whch could have been avoided and may impact testability on > > > affected systems. > > > > Are you saying that this patch which fixes s2idle on some random box > > should've gone to Linus *immediately*? > > > > And read my mail again: > > > > "Some fixes need longer testing because there have been cases where > > a fix breaks something else." > > > > So yes, I disagree with rushing fixes immediately. If they're obvious > > - whatever that means - then sure but not all of them are such. > > > > -- > > Unfortunately, it looks like the broken commit got backported into 6.1.28, > but the fix still isn't in Linus' tree. > > Sasha, > > Can you please pick up > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=x86/urgent&id=23a5b8bb022c1e071ca91b1a9c10f0ad6a0966e9 > for 6.1.29 to fix the regression? Now that this is in Linus's tree, it's queued up, thanks. greg k-h
