Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:34:04 +0100 > Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Bjorn, > > I agreed with Stuart to take over the NPEM implementation[1]. > > First part I want to share is a small refactor around enclosure interface. > > > > The one sysfs change introduced is changing active LED to write-only. > > get_active() callback is not implemented for SES which is the > > only one enclosure API consumer now. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/cover.1643822289.git.stuart.w.hayes@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Mariusz Tkaczyk (3): > > misc: enclosure: remove get_active() callback > > misc: enclosure, ses: simplify some get callbacks > > misc: enclosure: update sysfs api > > > > drivers/misc/enclosure.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++----------------------- > > drivers/scsi/ses.c | 33 ++++++++------ > > include/linux/enclosure.h | 14 ++---- > > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) > > > > Hi Bjorn, > Could you please take a look? Let me know if you against this cleanup. > I would like to get back to NPEM, I based my patches on top of it. Hi Mariusz, I don't expect Bjorn to handle enclosure updates. I expect the upstream path for these patches is through the SCSI tree. Going forward you can use get_maintainer.pl for this routing information. $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl drivers/scsi/ses.c "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:SCSI SUBSYSTEM) "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:SCSI SUBSYSTEM) linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:SCSI SUBSYSTEM) linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list) I'll take a look and then you can resend to linux-scsi. I do like this stat line: 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) ...makes it compelling to take a look.
