On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:05:09AM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote: > From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:23 PM > > > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:35:46AM +0000, Jinank Jain wrote: > > > In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent > > > to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Applied to hyperv-next. Thanks. > > I'd like to hold off on taking this change. Nuno and I are discussing > how best to handle nested hypercalls. In addition to the proposed > nested changes, we have hypercall changes coming as part of the > TDX and fully enlightened SNP patch sets. If possible, I'd like to > avoid adding logic at the hv_do_hypercall() call sites. It's not clear > whether avoiding such logic will really be feasible, but I'd like to > think about it for a bit before reaching that conclusion. I thought that discussion will go on for a while but this patch fixed a real bug. Holding off is fine too. I will remove this patch from hyperv-next. Thanks, Wei. > > Michael >
