On 11-04-23, 19:59, Serge Semin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:32:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 06:39:18AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > It turns out the recent DW PCIe-related patchset was merged in with > > > several relatively trivial issues left unsettled (noted by Bjorn and > > > Manivannan). All of these lefovers have been fixed in this patchset. > > > Namely the series starts with two bug-fixes. The first one concerns the > > > improper link-mode initialization in case if the CDM-check is enabled. The > > > second unfortunate mistake I made in the IP-core version type helper. In > > > particular instead of testing the IP-core version type the macro function > > > referred to the just IP-core version which obviously wasn't what I > > > intended. > > > > > > Afterwards two @Mani-noted fixes follow. Firstly the dma-ranges related warning > > > message is fixed to start with "DMA-ranges" word instead of "Dma-ranges". > > > Secondly the Baikal-T1 PCIe Host driver is converted to perform the > > > asynchronous probe type which saved us of about 15% of bootup time if no any > > > PCIe peripheral device attached to the port. > > > > > > Then the patchset contains the Baikal-T1 PCIe driver fix. The > > > corresponding patch removes the false error message printed during the > > > controller probe procedure. I accidentally added the unconditional > > > dev_err_probe() method invocation. It was obviously wrong. > > > > > > Then two trivial cleanups are introduced. The first one concerns the > > > duplicated fast-link-mode flag unsetting. The second one implies > > > dropping a redundant empty line from the dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed() > > > function. > > > > > > The series continues with a patch inspired by the last @Bjorn note > > > regarding the generic resources request interface. As @Bjorn correctly > > > said it would be nice to have the new interface used wider in the DW PCIe > > > subsystem. Aside with the Baikal-T1 PCIe Host driver the Toshiba Visconti > > > PCIe driver can be easily converted to using the generic clock names. > > > That's what is done in the noted patch. > > > > > > The patchset is closed with a series of MAINTAINERS-list related patches. > > > Firstly after getting the DW PCIe RP/EP DT-schemas refactored I forgot to > > > update the MAINTAINER-list with the new files added in the framework of > > > that procedure. All the snps,dw-pcie* schemas shall be maintained by the > > > DW PCIe core driver maintainers. Secondly seeing how long it took for my > > > patchsets to review and not having any comments from the original driver > > > maintainers I'd suggest to add myself as the reviewer to the DW PCIe and > > > eDMA drivers. Thus hopefully the new updates review process will be > > > performed with much less latencies. For the same reason I would also like > > > to suggest to add @Manivannan as the DW PCIe/eDMA drivers maintainer if > > > he isn't against that idea. What do you think about the last suggestion? > > > > > > > I'm willing to co-maintain the drivers. > > Awesome! @Bjorn, @Lorenzo, @Vinod what do you think about this? If you > are ok with that shall I resubmit the series with @Mani added to the > DW PCIe/eDMA maintainers list or will you create the respective > patches yourself? Pls send the patch, that is preferred. -- ~Vinod
