Re: [Patch v4 01/10] dt-bindings: memory: tegra: add bpmp ref in tegra234-mc node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/03/2023 18:14, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> For Tegra234, add the "nvidia,bpmp" property within the Memory
> Controller (MC) node to reference BPMP node. This is needed in
> the MC driver to pass the client info to the BPMP-FW when memory
> interconnect support is available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml    | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml
> index 935d63d181d9..398d27bb2373 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml
> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ properties:
>    "#interconnect-cells":
>      const: 1
>  
> +  nvidia,bpmp:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> +    description: phandle of the node representing the BPMP

Why do you need this multiple times? Both in parent and all external-mc
children?

> +
>  patternProperties:
>    "^external-memory-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>      description:
> @@ -220,6 +224,9 @@ allOf:
>              - const: ch14
>              - const: ch15
>  
> +        nvidia,bpmp:
> +          description: phandle of the node representing the BPMP

I don't understand for what this hunk is. It does not look like in
correct place at all.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux