From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 8:49 AM > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:43:06PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Ok, lemme queue 1-2,4-6 as previously mentioned. > > With first six applied: > > arch/x86/coco/core.c:123:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sev_status' > if (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SNP_VTOM) > ^ > arch/x86/coco/core.c:139:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sev_status' > if (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SNP_VTOM) > ^ > 2 errors generated. > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: arch/x86/coco/core.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: arch/x86/coco] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: arch/x86] Error 2 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make: *** [Makefile:2025: .] Error 2 > > compiler is: > > Debian clang version 14.0.6-2 > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > InstalledDir: /usr/bin > > .config is attached. > OK, I see what went wrong. I had tested with CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT=n and didn't see any compile problems. It turns out in my test, arch/x86/coco/core.c wasn't built at all because I did not also have TDX configured, so I didn't see any errors. But with CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST=y, coco/core.c gets built, and the error with undefined sev_status pops out. The straightforward fix is somewhat ugly. That's to put #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT around the entire CC_VENDOR_AMD case in cc_mkenc() and in cc_mkdec(). Or put it just around the test of sev_status. Perhaps a cleaner way would be to have a "vendor_subtype" variable declared in arch/x86/coco/core.c and tested instead of sev_status. That subtype variable would be set from hv_vtom_init(), maybe via a separate accessor function. But didn't I recently see a patch that makes the existing "vendor" variable no longer static? In that case just setting vendor_subtype without the accessor function may be OK. What's your preference Boris? I can spin a v7 of the patch series that fixes this, and that squashes the last two patches of the series per Lorenz Pieralisi's comments. Michael