Hi, On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:45 AM <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code. > > Signed-off-by: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c > index 63a5f4463a9f..964de0e8c6a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c > @@ -220,10 +220,9 @@ static int mt7621_pcie_parse_port(struct mt7621_pcie *pcie, > } > > port->pcie_rst = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(node, NULL); > - if (PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > - dev_err(dev, "failed to get pcie%d reset control\n", slot); > - return PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst); > - } > + > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst), > + "failed to get pcie%d reset control\n", slot); > > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "pcie-phy%d", slot); > port->phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, node, name); So this code is unreachable now. Please fix your tools. > -- > 2.25.1 Also, this is not a probe(), so I don't see a point of using dev_err_probe() here. Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos