On 28-02-2023 08:38 am, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
On 2/27/23 6:53 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
On 28-02-2023 12:59 am, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
Hi,
On 2/27/23 5:21 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
As per PCI specification (PCI Express Base Specification Revision
6.0, Section 10.5) both PF and VFs of a PCI EP are permitted to be enabled
independently for ATS capability, however the STU(Smallest Translation
Unit) is shared between PF and VFs. For VFs, it is hardwired to Zero and
the associated PF's value applies to VFs.
In the current code, the STU is being configured while enabling the PF ATS.
Hence, it is not able to enable ATS for VFs, if it is not enabled on the
associated PF already.>
Adding a function pci_ats_stu_configure(), which can be called to
configure the STU during PF enumeration.
Latter enumerations of VFs can successfully enable ATS independently.
Why not enable ATS in PF before enabling it in VF? Just updating STU of
PF and not enabling it seem odd.
More details are in PATCH 0/2 and 2/2.
Also, This was discussed at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230221154624.GA3701506@bhelgaas/T/
I agree with Bjorn's comments. It is incorrect to directly configure PF
registers from VF enable function. It is a buggy fix.
My question is, why not ensure PF ATS is configured and enabled before enabling
ATS for VF. Anyway, PF device will be enumerated before VF, right?
Yes, however ATS is not enabled in passthrough.
When ATS is not enabled, this new helper can be called to init STU since
it is shared with VFs.
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/ats.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/pci-ats.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
index f9cc2e10b676..70e1982efdb4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
@@ -46,6 +46,34 @@ bool pci_ats_supported(struct pci_dev *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ats_supported);
+/**
+ * pci_ats_stu_configure - Configure STU of a PF.
+ * @dev: the PCI device
+ * @ps: the IOMMU page shift
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, or negative on failure.
+ */
+int pci_ats_stu_configure(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps)
+{
+ u16 ctrl;
+
+ if (dev->ats_enabled || dev->is_virtfn)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!pci_ats_supported(dev))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (ps < PCI_ATS_MIN_STU)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dev->ats_stu = ps;
+ ctrl = PCI_ATS_CTRL_STU(dev->ats_stu - PCI_ATS_MIN_STU);
+ pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->ats_cap + PCI_ATS_CTRL, ctrl);
If you just want to update the STU, don't overwrite other fields.
Can be read modify write, but felt not necessary, since all other fields are at default value zero.
It may not always be true. If there is a case where AMAD and AMAE attribute values are
configured independently, then your change can overwrite it.
IMO, since your intention is to update STU, I recommend just updating it.
OK, I will change to it read-modify-write.
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ats_stu_configure);
+
/**
* pci_enable_ats - enable the ATS capability
* @dev: the PCI device
@@ -68,8 +96,8 @@ int pci_enable_ats(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps)
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * Note that enabling ATS on a VF fails unless it's already enabled
- * with the same STU on the PF.
+ * Note that enabling ATS on a VF fails unless it's already
+ * configured with the same STU on the PF.
*/
ctrl = PCI_ATS_CTRL_ENABLE;
if (dev->is_virtfn) {
diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ats.h b/include/linux/pci-ats.h
index df54cd5b15db..9b40eb555124 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci-ats.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci-ats.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
/* Address Translation Service */
bool pci_ats_supported(struct pci_dev *dev);
int pci_enable_ats(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps);
+int pci_ats_stu_configure(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps);
What about dummy declaration for !CONFIG_PCI_ATS case?
Thanks, I overlooked else case.
void pci_disable_ats(struct pci_dev *dev);
int pci_ats_queue_depth(struct pci_dev *dev);
int pci_ats_page_aligned(struct pci_dev *dev);
Thanks,
Ganapat
Thanks,
Ganapat
