> Subject: Re: [External] : RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: layerscape: Add EP
> mode support for ls1028a
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
>
> can it be like this for better readability. ?
It is just chip name and follow name conversion, which already upstreamed and documented.
Why do you think it not is good readability?
Frank Li
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
