On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:23:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/01/2023 15:03, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:02:27AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 30/12/2022 14:42, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:32:02 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>> qcom,perst-regs is an phandle array of one item with a phandle and its > >>>> arguments. > >>> > >>> Applied to pci/dt, thanks! > >>> > >>> [1/1] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,pcie-ep: correct qcom,perst-regs > >>> https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/68909a813609 > >> > >> It's still not in linux-next. Is you tree correctly included in the next? > > > > It's on Lorenzo's branch > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git/) > > but I haven't pulled it into my "next" branch yet. Will try to do > > that today. > > If Lorenzo picks up patches which at some point are merged by another > maintainer, his tree should be in linux-next as well (and in LKP tests). > Otherwise we loose some build and test coverage. Oh, I remember what happened. I started the merge a while ago and tripped over the conflict between these: dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: add MSM8998 specific compatible dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add sm8350 to bindings I asked about splitting the first and if you did that, I missed it, and in the meantime I got distracted by my E820/EfiMemoryMappedIO regression. In any event, I updated "next" with this. Check my conflict resolution because I'm not a DT expert: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml?id=25cfdd48a4bd
