On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:23:54AM -0600, Frank Li wrote:
> + * +--------------------------------------------------+ Base
> + * | |
> + * | |
> + * | |
> + * | Common Control Register |
> + * | |
> + * | |
> + * | |
> + * +-----------------------+--------------------------+ Base+span_offset
> + * | | |
> + * | Peer Span Space | Span Space |
> + * | | |
> + * | | |
> + * +-----------------------+--------------------------+ Base+span_offset
> + * | | | +span_count * 4
> + * | | |
> + * | Span Space | Peer Span Space |
> + * | | |
> + * +-----------------------+--------------------------+
Are these comments supposed to say *spad*, i.e., scratchpad space,
instead of "span", to correspond with spad_offset and spad_count
below?
> +struct epf_ntb_ctrl {
> + u32 command;
> + u32 argument;
> + u16 command_status;
> + u16 link_status;
> + u32 topology;
> + u64 addr;
> + u64 size;
> + u32 num_mws;
> + u32 reserved;
> + u32 spad_offset;
> + u32 spad_count;
> + u32 db_entry_size;
> + u32 db_data[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> + u32 db_offset[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> +} __packed;
