> That isn't the point. A 2-second hot loop is just as bad. > There should be a usleep_range() or similar between loop iterations. I'll replace schedule() with usleep_range() Alvaro
> That isn't the point. A 2-second hot loop is just as bad. > There should be a usleep_range() or similar between loop iterations. I'll replace schedule() with usleep_range() Alvaro
|