Hi Thomas, On 11/18/2022 2:59 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote: > On 11/18/2022 2:31 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18 2022 at 10:18, Reinette Chatre wrote: >>>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int msi_insert_desc(struct device *dev, struct msi_desc *desc, >>>> if (ret) >>>> goto fail; >>>> >>>> - desc->msi_index = index; >>>> + desc->msi_index = index - baseidx; >>> >>> Could msi_desc->msi_index be made bigger? The hardware I am testing >>> on claims to support more IMS entries than what the u16 can >>> accommodate. >> >> Sure that's trivial. How big does it claim it is? > > 2048 Dave Jiang corrected me ... the max the hardware can support is 16128 so the current size of msi_index is sufficient. Reinette
