On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Maybe we can put VF and PF in bus->devices like: >> VF come first than PF? > > Ugh. Ok, so that's a disgusting hack, but it's better than messing up > the generic PCI subsystem. At least it's a disgusting hack in the IOV > code. just tested, the patch with this hack works. > > I still would prefer to just do the virtual devices right instead. Or > even just make the removal loop inherently robust, rather than have > that insane knowledge of virtual function devices that were done so > horribly wrong. ok, let me think about it more. > > Or even just *keep* the virtual devices on the list even though the > physical device has been removed - make them independent of the > physical device. ah, not sure how this going to work. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
