On Sunday 09 October 2022 15:39:11 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 09/10/2022 à 13:29, Pali Rohár a écrit : > > On Thursday 18 August 2022 11:52:20 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:37:56PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Thursday 18 August 2022 16:59:33 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:50:09PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > PING? > > > > > > > > > > Pretty much anything sent during the merge window, and just before the > > > > > merge window gets thrown away. Please rebase onto the current pci tree > > > > > and repost. > > > > > > > > Please write it pretty clear that you are not interested in those > > > > patches, and not hiding this info behind asking me after month of > > > > waiting for another work of rebase with sending them at eight o'clock > > > > during full moon. It is pretty ridiculous how to say "go away". Thanks. > > > > > > Nobody is saying "go away". I apologize that I haven't had time to > > > look at this yet. > > > > > > It's still in patchwork [1], and if it still applies cleanly to > > > v6.0-rc1, you don't need to do anything. If it requires rebasing to > > > apply cleanly, it will expedite things if you do that. > > > > > > Bjorn > > > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20220714184130.5436-1-pali@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > It applies cleanly on v6.0-rc1. > > > > On linux-next, the diff applies, but with offsets on pci.c and pci.h. > > CJ This should not be an issue. Bjorn?
