Re: [PATCH 00/13] Remove unused microblaze PCIe bus architecture

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>]

On 10/25/22 10:26, Havalige, Thippeswamy wrote:
> Hi,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 1:02 PM
> > To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige@xxxxxxx>; linux-
> > pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; michals@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; Gogada, Bharat Kumar
> > <bharat.kumar.gogada@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Remove unused microblaze PCIe bus architecture
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/25/22 08:52, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> > > The current Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver uses generic PCIe
> > > subsystem framework. This driver works on both Microblaze and Zynq
> > > architecture based platforms.
> > >
> > > The microblaze architecture specific code has unused PCIe host bridge
> > > supported API's which are no longer needed.
> > >
> > > This series of patch removes unused architecture specific microblaze
> > > PCIe code.
> > >
> > > Thippeswamy Havalige (13):
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused early_read_config_byte() et al
> > >       declarations
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove Null PCI config access unused functions
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused PCI bus scan if configured as a host
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused PCI legacy IO's access on a bus
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused device tree parsing for a host bridge
> > >       resources
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused allocation & free of PCI host bridge
> > >       structure
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused PCI BIOS resource allocation
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused PCI Indirect ops
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused pci_address_to_pio() conversion of CPU
> > >       address to I/O port
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused sys_pciconfig_iobase() and et al
> > >       declaration
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove unused pci_iobar_pfn() and et al declarations
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Remove support for Xilinx PCI host bridge
> > >     microblaze/PCI: Moving PCI iounmap and dependent code
> > >
> > >    arch/microblaze/Kconfig                  |    8 -
> > >    arch/microblaze/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |   92 ---
> > >    arch/microblaze/include/asm/pci.h        |   29 -
> > >    arch/microblaze/pci/Makefile             |    3 +-
> > >    arch/microblaze/pci/indirect_pci.c       |  158 -----
> > >    arch/microblaze/pci/iomap.c              |   36 +
> > >    arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c         | 1067 ------------------------------
> > >    arch/microblaze/pci/xilinx_pci.c         |  170 -----
> > >    8 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1526 deletions(-)
> > >    delete mode 100644 arch/microblaze/pci/indirect_pci.c
> > >    delete mode 100644 arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > >    delete mode 100644 arch/microblaze/pci/xilinx_pci.c
> >
> > Why are you sending it again?
> >
> > M
>
>
> Last time mails were not delivered to opensource maintainers due to some access permissions.

But people in TO/CC got it. It means you should send it as RESEND or v2 to avoid 
confusion.

Thanks,
Michal