Re: [PATCH] PCI: Align MPS to upstream bridge for SAFE and PERFORMANCE mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:25:59PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2022-06-10 23:01:31, Zhiqiang Hou wrote:
> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The commit 27d868b5e6cf ("PCI: Set MPS to match upstream bridge")
> > made the device's MPS matches upstream bridge for PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT
> > mode, so that it's more likely that a hot-added device will work in
> > a system with an optimized MPS configuration.
> > 
> > Obviously, the Linux itself optimizes the MPS settings in the
> > PCIE_BUS_SAFE and PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE mode, so let's do this also
> > for these modes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> 
> I wanted to give a little more information about the issue we're seeing.
> We're having trouble retaining the optimized Max Payload Size (MPS)
> value of a PCIe endpoint after hotplug/rescan. In this case,
> `pcie_ports=native` and `pci=pcie_bus_safe` are set on the cmdline and
> we expect the Linux kernel to retain the MPS value. Commit 27d868b5e6cf
> preserved the MPS value when using the default PCIe bus mode
> (PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT) and we're hopeful that this can be extended to other
> modes, as well.

Thanks, Tyler.  I need help understanding what's going on here.  An
example of the topology and what happens and what *should* happen
might help.

Some MPS configuration is done per-device in pci_configure_mps(), and
some considers a hierarchy in pcie_bus_configure_settings().  In the
current tree, in the PCIE_BUS_SAFE case:

  - pci_configure_mps() does nothing (except for RCiEPs).

  - pcie_bus_configure_settings(bus) looks at the hierarchy rooted at
    the bridge leading to "bus".  If the hierarchy contains a hotplug
    Switch Downstream Port, it sets MPS and MRRS to 128 for
    everything.

    If it does not contain such a bridge, it finds the smallest
    MPS_Supported ("smpss") of any device in the hierarchy and sets
    MPS and MRRS to that for everything.

If you boot with a hotplug Root Port leading to an empty slot, I think
the RP MPS will end up being whatever BIOS put there.

A subsequent hot-add will do nothing in pci_configure_mps(), and
pcie_bus_configure_settings() looks like it would set the RP and EP
MPS to the minimum of the RP and EP MPS_Supported.

Is that what you see?  What would you like to see instead?

Bjorn



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux