Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: don't fall back to defaults if _CRS has no apertures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Host bridges that lead to things like the Uncore need not have any
>> I/O port or MMIO apertures.  For example, in this case:
>>
>>    ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC1] (domain 0000 [bus ff])
>>    PCI: root bus ff: using default resources
>>    PCI host bridge to bus 0000:ff
>>    pci_bus 0000:ff: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xffff]
>>    pci_bus 0000:ff: root bus resource [mem 0x00000000-0x3fffffffffff]
>>
>> we should not pretend those default resources are available on bus ff.
>>
>> CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c |    7 ++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
>> index 0a45d1c..67d9b49 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
>> @@ -405,7 +405,12 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>                kfree(sd);
>>        } else {
>>                get_current_resources(device, busnum, domain, &resources);
>> -               if (list_empty(&resources))
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * _CRS with no apertures is normal, so only fall back to
>> +                * defaults or native bridge info if we're ignoring _CRS.
>> +                */
>> +               if (!pci_use_crs)
>>                        x86_pci_root_bus_resources(busnum, &resources);
>>                bridge = pci_create_host_bridge(NULL, domain, &root->secondary,
>>                                                &resources, &pci_root_ops, sd);
>>
>
> how about system with ACPI support, but does not have _CRS or _CRS has
> parse error ?

Do you have examples of such systems?  I haven't seen any, and I'm not
sure it's worth worrying about them unless they actually exist.

It doesn't seem like it would make any sense to use ACPI to describe a
host bridge without using _CRS to describe its properties.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux