Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Use PCI_CONF1_EXT_ADDRESS() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 28/09/2022 13:19, Pali Rohár wrote:
Simplify pci-tegra.c driver code and use new PCI_CONF1_EXT_ADDRESS() macro
for accessing PCI config space.

Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Please look also at this related patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20220911113216.14892-1-pali@xxxxxxxxxx/
---
  drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 11 +++--------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
index 5df90d183526..c9924e75e597 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
@@ -417,13 +417,6 @@ static inline u32 pads_readl(struct tegra_pcie *pcie, unsigned long offset)
   * address (access to which generates correct config transaction) falls in
   * this 4 KiB region.
   */
-static unsigned int tegra_pcie_conf_offset(u8 bus, unsigned int devfn,
-					   unsigned int where)
-{
-	return ((where & 0xf00) << 16) | (bus << 16) | (PCI_SLOT(devfn) << 11) |
-	       (PCI_FUNC(devfn) << 8) | (where & 0xff);
-}
-
  static void __iomem *tegra_pcie_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
  					unsigned int devfn,
  					int where)
@@ -445,7 +438,9 @@ static void __iomem *tegra_pcie_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
  		unsigned int offset;
  		u32 base;
- offset = tegra_pcie_conf_offset(bus->number, devfn, where);
+		offset = PCI_CONF1_EXT_ADDRESS(bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
+					       PCI_FUNC(devfn), where) &
+			 ~PCI_CONF1_ENABLE;
/* move 4 KiB window to offset within the FPCI region */
  		base = 0xfe100000 + ((offset & ~(SZ_4K - 1)) >> 8);


Our PCIe test on Tegra124 Jetson TK1 is currently failing on -next and bisect points to this commit. Looking at bit closer, the problem appears to be the PCI_CONF1_REG_MASK which has a value of 0xfc. Before this patch was applied a mask of 0xff was applied to the lower 8-bits of 'where' and now it is 0xfc. So this does not work for Tegra as it is.

Let me know if you have any thoughts?

Jon

--
nvpublic



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux