On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 22:19 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > I suppose you might want "Overriding ownership to dom%d".
> >
> > OK. To the point and potentially can fit in 80 lines :-).
>
> how about this?
> >
> From a3d4a80cdfd4274016522572148a89260b3f3de6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:16:45 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/pciback: Expand the warning message to include domain
> id.
>
> When a PCI device is transferred to another domain and it is still
> in usage (from the internal perspective), mention which other
> domain is using it to aid in debugging.
>
> [v2: Truncate the verbose message per Jan Beulich suggestion]
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
> index 474d52e..2405a24 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
> @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ static int xen_pcibk_export_device(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
> dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "registering for %d\n", pdev->xdev->otherend_id);
> if (xen_register_device_domain_owner(dev,
> pdev->xdev->otherend_id) != 0) {
> - dev_err(&dev->dev, "device has been assigned to another " \
> - "domain! Over-writting the ownership, but beware.\n");
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "Overriding ownership to dom%d.\n",
> + xen_find_device_domain_owner(dev));
That sounds like you are going to be assigning the ownership to that
dom, but xen_find_device_domain_owner so aren't you actually steeling
ownership from that domain?
> xen_unregister_device_domain_owner(dev);
> xen_register_device_domain_owner(dev, pdev->xdev->otherend_id);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
