On Tuesday 06 September 2022 14:40:15 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 02:26:32PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:16:28PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > On Tuesday 06 September 2022 13:43:01 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to > > > > gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want to > > > > make private to gpiolib. > > > > > > There are many pending pci-mvebu.c patches waiting for review and merge, > > > so I would suggest to wait until all other mvebu patches are processed > > > and then process this one... longer waiting period :-( > > > > OK, it is not super urgent. OTOH it is a very simple patch :) > > By the way, do the pending patches address soft-leaking of reset GPIO > when the driver fails to acquire clock for a port (I called it > soft-leaking since devm will free it on unbind)? I think no, because there is not any patch related to GPIO reset.
