On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:59:44 +0100, Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > And I stand by my initial request. "a" doesn't convey any sort of > > useful information. Why not "I" and "II", while we're at it? Or > > something even funkier? > > MU spec use term "a" and "b", user have to map "I" an "II" to > "a" and "b" when read MU spec and code. it is not straightforward. > > I quote a part of spec. > " The MU is connected as a peripheral under the Peripheral bus on both sides-on > the Processor A-side, the Processor A Peripheral Bus, and on the Processor B side, > the Processor B Peripheral Bus." > > Rob Herring and Marc Zynginer: > I can change to any name, which you agree both. > > Some options: > 1. "a", "b" > 2. "a-side", "b-side" > 3. "a-facing", "b-facing" > 4. "I", "II" Use the wording indicated in the spec: "processor-a-side", and "processor-b-side". This is what I asked the first place. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
