On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:40:55 +0100 Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:45:10PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:47:05 +0100 > > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:06:23AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > Alex Williamson (2): > > > > PCI: More PRI/PASID cleanup > > > > PCI: Enable is not exposed as a PASID capability > > > > > > For both: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> > > > > Ok, thanks guys. I'll queue these up after Thanksgiving. > > > > -- > > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > Great. Can you provide a seperate branch with these changes that I can > pull into my tree, please? I have upcoming changes that will conflict > with these patches. And I would like to solve them before merge. Ok, I pushed these to a 'pri-changes' branch, which is a superset of my current linux-next branch. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
