On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:38:09 +0530 Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch adds INTx handling during runtime suspend/resume. > All the suspend/resume related code for the user to put the device > into the low power state will be added in subsequent patches. > > The INTx are shared among devices. Whenever any INTx interrupt comes "The INTx lines may be shared..." > for the VFIO devices, then vfio_intx_handler() will be called for each > device. Inside vfio_intx_handler(), it calls pci_check_and_mask_intx() "...device sharing the interrupt." > and checks if the interrupt has been generated for the current device. > Now, if the device is already in the D3cold state, then the config space > can not be read. Attempt to read config space in D3cold state can > cause system unresponsiveness in a few systems. To prevent this, mask > INTx in runtime suspend callback and unmask the same in runtime resume > callback. If INTx has been already masked, then no handling is needed > in runtime suspend/resume callbacks. 'pm_intx_masked' tracks this, and > vfio_pci_intx_mask() has been updated to return true if INTx has been > masked inside this function. > > For the runtime suspend which is triggered for the no user of VFIO > device, the is_intx() will return false and these callbacks won't do > anything. > > The MSI/MSI-X are not shared so similar handling should not be > needed for MSI/MSI-X. vfio_msihandler() triggers eventfd_signal() > without doing any device-specific config access. When the user performs > any config access or IOCTL after receiving the eventfd notification, > then the device will be moved to the D0 state first before > servicing any request. > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 6 ++++- > include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > index a0d69ddaf90d..5948d930449b 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > @@ -259,16 +259,45 @@ int vfio_pci_set_power_state(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, pci_power_t stat > return ret; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > +static int vfio_pci_core_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + /* > + * If INTx is enabled, then mask INTx before going into the runtime > + * suspended state and unmask the same in the runtime resume. > + * If INTx has already been masked by the user, then > + * vfio_pci_intx_mask() will return false and in that case, INTx > + * should not be unmasked in the runtime resume. > + */ > + vdev->pm_intx_masked = (is_intx(vdev) && vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev)); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vfio_pci_core_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + if (vdev->pm_intx_masked) > + vfio_pci_intx_unmask(vdev); > + > + return 0; > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */ > + > /* > - * The dev_pm_ops needs to be provided to make pci-driver runtime PM working, > - * so use structure without any callbacks. > - * > * The pci-driver core runtime PM routines always save the device state > * before going into suspended state. If the device is going into low power > * state with only with runtime PM ops, then no explicit handling is needed > * for the devices which have NoSoftRst-. > */ > -static const struct dev_pm_ops vfio_pci_core_pm_ops = { }; > +static const struct dev_pm_ops vfio_pci_core_pm_ops = { > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(vfio_pci_core_runtime_suspend, > + vfio_pci_core_runtime_resume, > + NULL) > +}; > > int vfio_pci_core_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > { > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c > index 6069a11fb51a..1a37db99df48 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c > @@ -33,10 +33,12 @@ static void vfio_send_intx_eventfd(void *opaque, void *unused) > eventfd_signal(vdev->ctx[0].trigger, 1); > } > > -void vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > +/* Returns true if INTx has been masked by this function. */ > +bool vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > { > struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev; > unsigned long flags; > + bool intx_masked = false; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&vdev->irqlock, flags); > > @@ -60,9 +62,11 @@ void vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > disable_irq_nosync(pdev->irq); > > vdev->ctx[0].masked = true; > + intx_masked = true; > } > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vdev->irqlock, flags); > + return intx_masked; > } There's certainly another path through this function that masks the interrupt, which makes the definition of this return value a bit confusing. Wouldn't it be simpler not to overload the masked flag on the interrupt context like this and instead set a new flag on the vdev under irqlock to indicate the device is unable to generate interrupts. The irq handler would add a test of this flag before any tests that would access the device. Thanks, Alex > /* > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > index 23c176d4b073..cdfd328ba6b1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device { > bool needs_reset; > bool nointx; > bool needs_pm_restore; > + bool pm_intx_masked; > struct pci_saved_state *pci_saved_state; > struct pci_saved_state *pm_save; > int ioeventfds_nr; > @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device { > #define is_irq_none(vdev) (!(is_intx(vdev) || is_msi(vdev) || is_msix(vdev))) > #define irq_is(vdev, type) (vdev->irq_type == type) > > -extern void vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev); > +extern bool vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev); > extern void vfio_pci_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev); > > extern int vfio_pci_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,