On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 06:31:09PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator disable > shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled(). > > Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off regulator when > the system is in suspend mode. > > To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the regulator > in shutdown. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-hongxing.z > hu@xxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > > static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > { > - struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev; > - > switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) { > case IMX7D: > case IMX8MQ: > @@ -702,14 +700,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > break; > } > > - if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) { > - int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); > - > - if (ret) > - dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > - ret); > - } > - > /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) > gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > @@ -722,7 +712,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > struct device *dev = pci->dev; > int ret; > > - if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie)) { > + if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) { > ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > @@ -795,7 +785,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > return 0; > > err_clks: > - if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) { > + if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) { > ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > @@ -1022,6 +1012,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > break; > } > > + if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) > + regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); > + > return 0; > } The suspend and resume methods should be symmetric, and they should *look* symmetric. imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq() disables the regulator, so imx6_pcie_resume_noirq() should enable it. imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq() calls imx6_pcie_clk_disable() to disable several clocks. imx6_pcie_resume_noirq() should call imx6_pcie_clk_enable() to enable them. imx6_pcie_clk_enable() *is* called in the resume path, but it's buried inside imx6_pcie_host_init() and imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(). That makes it hard to analyze. We should be able to look at imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq() and imx6_pcie_resume_noirq() and easily see that the resume path resumes everything that was suspended in the suspend path. Bjorn
