At 2022-06-22 06:49:52, "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Liang He wrote: >> In rcar_pcie_init(), we need to hold the reference returned by >> of_find_matching_node() which is used to call of_node_put() for >> refcount balance. >> >> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c >> index 997c4df6a1e7..405ec3d64f30 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c >> @@ -1158,7 +1158,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id rcar_pcie_abort_handler_of_match[] __initconst >> >> static int __init rcar_pcie_init(void) >> { >> - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, rcar_pcie_abort_handler_of_match)) { >> + struct device_node *np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rcar_pcie_abort_handler_of_match); >> + >> + if (np) { >> + of_node_put(np); > >I think this is correct, but it would be nicer to update the way this >driver uses of_device_get_match_data(), e.g., > > struct rcar_variant { > int (*phy_init_fn)(struct rcar_pcie_host *host); > bool hook_abort; > }; > > struct rcar_pcie_host { > ... > const struct rcar_variant *variant; > }; > > static int rcar_pcie_probe(...) > { > host->variant = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > err = host->variant->phy_init_fn(host); > ... > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM > if (host->variant->hook_abort) { > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE > hook_fault_code(17, ...); > # else > hook_fault_code(22, ...); > #endif > } > #endif > } > >Or keep the hook in a separate function called from rcar_pcie_probe() >if you think that's cleaner. > >I'm not sure hook_fault_code() needs to be called separately as a >device_initcall(). The pci-ixp4xx.c driver does it in >ixp4xx_pci_probe(), so I assume rcar could do it in probe as well. > >> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE >> hook_fault_code(17, rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0, >> "asynchronous external abort"); >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> Thanks very much for your effort to review my patch. Now I am very sorry that I only know how to correctly use of_find_xxx APIs and when there will be a leak bug. In another word, I have no idea the details of the drivers and I cannot do anyother thing than just fix the leak bug caused by missing of_node_put(). Sorry again. Liang