On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 08:48:50AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 05:12:56PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 01:41:48PM -0500, Zhi Li wrote: > > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 02:06:47PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > > > > > Default Designware EDMA just probe remotely at host side. > > > > > > This patch allow EDMA driver can probe at EP side. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Clean up patch > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Detach the private data and chip info structures > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove unused field irq in struct dw_edma_chip > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Change rg_region to reg_base in struct > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: rename wr(rd)_ch_cnt to ll_wr(rd)_cnt in struct > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Enhance EDMA driver to allow prode eDMA at EP side > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Add support for chip specific flags > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Add DW_EDMA_CHIP_32BIT_DBI for chip specific > > > > > > flags (this patch removed at v11 because dma tree already have fixed > > > > > > patch) > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Bugs fix at EDMA driver when probe eDMA at EP side > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix programming the source & dest addresses for > > > > > > ep > > > > > > dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction" member > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. change pci-epf-test to use EDMA driver to transfer data. > > > > > > PCI: endpoint: Add embedded DMA controller test > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. Using imx8dxl to do test, but some EP functions still have not > > > > > > upstream yet. So below patch show how probe eDMA driver at EP > > > > > > controller driver. > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220309120149.GB134091@thinkpad/T/#m979eb506c73ab3cfca2e7a43635ecdaec18d8097 > > > > > > > > > > The series has been hanging out on review for over three months now. > > > > > It has got to v11 and has been tested on at least two platforms. The > > > > > original driver maintainer has been silent for all that time (most > > > > > likely Gustavo dropped the driver maintaining role). Could you please > > > > > merge it in seeing no comments have been posted for the last several > > > > > weeks? The PCI Host/EP controller drivers maintainer suggested to get > > > > > this series via the DMA-engine tree: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/YnqlRShJzvma2SKM@lpieralisi/ > > > > > which is obviously right seeing it mainly concerns the DW eDMA driver. > > > > > Though after that Lorenzo disappeared as quickly as popped up.) > > > > > > > > > > There is one more series depending on the changes in this > > > > > patchset: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503225104.12108-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > Me and Frank already settled all the conflicts and inter-dependencies, > > > > > so at least his series is more than ready to be merged in into the > > > > > kernel repo. It would be very good to get it accepted on this merge > > > > > window so to have the kernel v5.19 with all this changes available. > > > > > > > > > Since the v5.19 merge window is already open, it seems doubtful that > > > > anybody would merge this so late in the cycle. > > In this case it would be safer to merge this whole series through your > repo. See my series: > "[PATCH v2 00/26] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add RP/EP local DMA controllers support" > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503225104.12108-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > depends in the Frank' patchset. Meanwhile my patchset is also based on the > DW PCIe modifications introduced in the set of the series: > "[PATCH v2 00/17] PCI: dwc: Add dma-ranges/YAML-schema/Baikal-T1 support" > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503214638.1895-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > and > "[PATCH v3 00/13] PCI: dwc: Various fixes and cleanups" > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220517125058.18488-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > So to speak in order to have more coherent repos with least merge, > logical problems the next order of the merging would be preferable: > 1) Frank's patchset (ready to be merged in): > [PATCH v11 0/8] Enable designware PCI EP EDMA locally > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220517151915.2212838-1-Frank.Li@xxxxxxx > 2) My series (ready to be merged in): > [PATCH v3 00/13] PCI: dwc: Various fixes and cleanups > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220517125058.18488-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > 3) My series (still in review, I need to fix some Rob' and Manivannan' notes) > [PATCH v2 00/17] PCI: dwc: Add dma-ranges/YAML-schema/Baikal-T1 support > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503214638.1895-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > 4) Me series (ready to be merged in, but depends on the prev patchsets): > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503225104.12108-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Seeing the Frank patches won't make it into the mainline repo on > this merge window, it would be great to collect all the changes in a > single repository. Seeing Lorenzo disappeared as fast as popped up > your repo is the best candidate since the DW eDMA block is a part of > the DW PCIe controller. I'll be happy to merge this via the PCI tree, given acks from Gustavo and/or Vinod. Bjorn
